this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Main

139 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (12 children)

You do have to question this entire piece of journalism considering it’s not telling us anything new or groundbreaking. We already know as fact that Clearlake have reported secret payments that were made under previous ownership to the Premier League months ago when going through the club’s finances. I don’t suppose Bruce Buck or Marina are around to face questioning?

I swear it’s like a new publication gets to write this exact story every couple of weeks (coincidentally the last one came during the last international break aka slow news cycle).

Next they’re going to tell us we paid Andreas Christensen’s dad as a scout or that we paid Bertrand Traore’s mum - both of which we’ve already served two transfer bans for btw.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (7 children)

We already know as fact that Clearlake have reported secret payments that were made under previous ownership to the Premier League months ago when going through the club’s finances.

I don't think much of it has been leaked to the press though - this is the media doing what the should be doing.

The question is, what kind of punishments should Chelsea face? If it's a small points deduction years later, when it ultimately doesn't matter, then it's not much of a deterrent to anyone else.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (6 children)

The only fair punishment that would also act as a deterrent, is to strip them of all their titles during this period.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Or make them take Havertz and Mount back and refund the clubs.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)