why?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 175 points 2 years ago (59 children)

they're probably patching a security flaw, because we live in the future now and it is perfectly normal for a simple clock to have backdoors that can read your bank accounts

  • source
  • hideshow 59 child comments
  • [–] 108 points 2 years ago (26 children)

    "My dishwasher is on the internet!" - "Why is on the internet?" - "To download software updates!" - "Why does it need software updates?" - "To fix security vulnerabilities!" - "Why would it have security vulnerabilities?" -"Because it's on the internet!"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I never connected my refrigerator to the internet. Why the fuck would I need Bixby on my refrigerator? I don't even use the voice assistant on my phone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Yeah, I’m absurdly suspicious of pretty much everything connected to the internet these days. I’m suspicious of any cameras, of people randomly happening to take a picture with me in the background. I’m suspicious of talking out loud around my phone…the future sucks.

    Although, thankfully the pandemic has given me a seemingly never-ending excuse to wear something over my face at all times.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (19 children)

    And here we have why I have not connected my smart dishwasher to the Internet. Those 2 extra wash cycles don't seem worth it. Especially considering I only ever use the most powerful sounding wash cycle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (17 children)

    I get that, I have a smart oven, washer, dryer and dishwasher. All connected to the internet (private guest network just in case), and they all send updates to one Telegram group chat using IFTTT. It's pretty convenient to get updates when a device is done.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (15 children)

    Mine just beep when they're done.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (13 children)

    The only two things that I like about smart appliances:

    • remote preheat for the oven (ready to pop the frozen pizza in right when I walk in the door)
    • cycle end notification for the washer (when I'm in the basement I can't hear the sound to know when to move the clothes to the dryer)

    I can't imagine needing a notification on the dishwasher (I'm never wanting for it to finish to do something else) or refrigerator (just what even would it do).

    I guess the smart control of the hvac is nice (turn it on when I'm on my way back from vacation so the temperature is perfect when I get home), but does that count as an appliance?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    A notification you've left the fridge door open could be handy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    I love that "door open" warning of my fridge, and I also like that I get a notification when the fridge unexpectedly disconnects from the network (which usually means that the power has gone out, so I can go and check before all my food has died).

    Also, the notifications when then laundry machine finishes are handy (so I can unload it and avoid smelly clothes).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP

    "Sounds like I left the fridge open."

    Seriously, I can hear that beep anywhere in the house.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)
    • remote preheat for the oven (ready to pop the frozen pizza in right when I walk in the door)

    Most ovens these days have a sort of time delay feature so you can set it to turn on X hours from now. Though I will admit it's more convenient not to have to estimate what time you're gonna be home at. Still, there are definitely alternatives to using an internet-connected over.

    • cycle end notification for the washer (when I'm in the basement I can't hear the sound to know when to move the clothes to the dryer)

    I already know my washing machine takes almost exactly 30 minutes to finish after I turn on the water. I just set a timer on my phone for that amount of time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    The delayed start requires planning ahead. I'm...not great at that.

    As for the laundry cycles, my washer is variable on time depending on load size or dirt level or something. It's rarely done by the time it estimates at the start.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    I could see a connected dishwasher being useful if all water using apps (liances, not lications) could coordinate with the water softener to determine if it needs to cycle before they start (and to automatically start once the soft water is ready).

    Is that even a thing?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago*

    The fuck a smart dishwasher gonna do, play Mozart while my dishes get smashed around inside then receive a text message later saying "Oi it's me ur dishwasher I just finished the dishes" while it plays Mozart again but at max volume until you waddle your fatass over and press the 'shut the fuck up' button?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (28 children)

    The companies BUILD IN backdoors so that they can steal your data.

    But because the backdoor is built in, they have to constantly monitor and update the security around it so that "bad guys" (they don't think they are the bad guys) don't get in.

    They only do security updates to prevent liability iirc.

    The whole thing stinks.

    Note: I'm not a software developer just an outraged bystander with tech hobbies and techy friends, it's possible this isn't true.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    No need for backdoors when the front door is perfectly legal. The need to monitor for bad actors is still correct, though; mostly because they skimp on development costs and penetration testing. Like they say, "never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence." Or in this case, slashing budgets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I hate Hanlon's Razor with a passion. It's just a way to introduce plausible deniability for cases that do involve malice. Not that this stuff necessarily is malicious, I just think it's dumb to rule out maliciousness any time it could be incompetence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    If I were to rewrite Hanlon's Razor today, I would update it as so: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence or indifference." Because yes, it does introduce plausible deniability; but most of the most harmful things in our modern world aren't malice, but simply big companies caring less about you than about their own precious profits, or politicians caring less about their constituents than about their kickbacks and campaigns.

    But admittedly, the word "adequately" does do a lot of heavy lifting in the original and in my update, because I'd counter your (quite reasonable) objection with the corollary that if malice is evident, incompetence is no longer an adequate explanation.

    In general, though, I've had simply too much experience in this world to believe that there's a grand conspiratorial plan behind anything awful people do these days.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Good comment, I can agree with it. Though to address your last paragraph, I wasn't trying to say that it's usually maliciousness or best to assume it, I just don't think it should be summarily dismissed.

    I'd also say that there's not much functional difference between a pattern of malice, incompetence, or indifference.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Totally true. Though you might address the various patterns differently (malice = legal action, incompetence = mandated education, indifference = financial penalty), the results of the patterns are often the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It’s difficult to monetise data if you source it illegally (except in China maybe). Nobody reads the ToS anyway so it’s not like you need a backdoor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I have been with a few companies as an engineer, and can at least confirm that you are right from my experience. Nobody really needs a backdoor to get massive amounts of data. The ToS for most software makes it so they can already do whatever they want with it. It's pretty easy to get a lot of data just by having people use their services normally.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (16 replies)