this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
33 points (92.3% liked)

GenZedong

4302 readers
212 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

what do y'all think of this? It makes some good points and Micheal Hudson is probably not right, but I have one criticism to make. One of his arguments that the richest people are still industrial capitalists (because they started businesses that do stuff), not finance capitalists, but as Cory Doctorow points out, those companies are basically just rentiers at this point. Amazon makes most of its money hosting other businesses on their site, "Meta" makes most of its money hosting being a middleman connecting advertisers and unpaid content creators poorly. Thus, it seems at least the emperial core has increased rentierism. This doesn't mean it's not built on peripheral industry and that reindustrializing the west would benefit average people, but it does seem to be good news about the decline of empire. Other thoughts?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's strange to me that being responsive to questions, regardless of the amount of social clout someone has, is somehow spun as a bad characteristic about Roderic here.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the insanity is the extent to which he is terminally online, not necessarily that he will reply to anyone.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They haven't posted in four months 👀👀👀

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can you please let me know how often I should post such that I am neither terminally online nor suspiciously off-line?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

Lol, that's not what I meant I find the weak "too/under online" comments annoying

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i mean, being terminally online is objectively bad. I think we can all agree even while being guilty of it.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Look at how long they went without commenting before this lmfao

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Responding in ten seconds abt how your claims would never be taken seriously for identity politics reasons is not being responsive to questions. They're just seething attempts at pithy remarks 60% of the time.

Literally saying nobody in Latin America would take Ruy Mauro Marini's theories seriously. What a useless suckup Twitter blowhard.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

Wow you really logged in after 4 months to defend your liege 😵‍💫