It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
https://nitter.net/PeterSinger/status/1722440246972018857
No, the art does not depict bestiality, don't worry.
this topic is like a sandtrap honestly, feels like everybody comes at it from different directions
like of course people shouldn't be having sex with animals irl, I think the consent argument works here. Unfortunately there is a communication barrier between humans and other animals, and until that barrier can be magically crossed we simply will not be able to confirm consent, which means sex is off the table.
But over on the other end, I don't think people who jack it to lion king rule 34 porn should be arrested. People who try to come up with essential reasons why it's immoral seem silly to me, as if there's some line that can be drawn between good arousal and evil arousal.