this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
292 points (92.7% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7192 readers
899 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Progressives need to leave this dog shit party.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What we need to do is get rid of FPTP, because so long as that's how the system works breaking away will only guarantee that the fascists win permanently.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Genocide is happening under the non-fascist party. What's the fucking point?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the sad fact is many people in the US are okay with financing genocide as long as they don't have to hear Trump's name or suffer any consequences personally. As long as some kind of right wing boogeymany exists, you can convince most democratic voters that genocide is permissable enough to not disqualify a candidate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think the sad thing is people thinking that if it were Trump instead of Biden right now, there wouldn't be any genocide. When in fact trump would be supporting genocide both in Gaza and in Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So how much genocide in your opinion is okay to vote for under the suspicion that someone else might also do a genocide?

Because either you're admitting theres no way to vote ourselves out of genocide or that joes genocides is okay because someone else MAY also preside over genocide. Thats a new one, this genocide is acceptable because if it wasn't this, it would just be another genocide, do I have that right?

Im of the opinion that I cannot materially support genocide. Call it single issue voterism if you want but to me never again means never again, not never again unless maybe the someone else would also finance genocide. Having boundaries is healthy and just, and if genocide is only a soft boundary for someone then I place no value in what they have to say.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is your intent to refuse to vote in the next election?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I dont believe voting does much, but I know refusing to vote doesn't do anything, I don't see why I wouldn't show up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In FPTP a non-vote is still a vote. I am consistently astonished at Lemmy being unable to understand this simple concept.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

We'd still get genocide regardless of who the president is. The killing machine operates the same no matter who pulls the levers.

I won't vote for genocide.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well yeah but that's a lot different than what the guy I replied to said

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

No it's not.

Their point was that liberals are okay with genocide under Democrats, but if Trump was president they'd be against it. No one thinks that, if Trump were president, there wouldn't be a genocide. The genocide is non negotiable.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Do you prefer

  1. Genocide, drone strikes, mass deportations, legal abortion, Supreme Court judges who aren't having massive ethics scandals, regulations, etc

or

  1. Genocide, drone strikes, mass deportation, abortion bans, Supreme Court judges with giant ethics scandals, deregulation, tax cuts for billionaires, etc?

Both parties are similarly shitty on some things, but are pretty different on other issues. Are you really indifferent to all the issues they differ on?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

When faced with two options that are both genocide why buy into a false dicthomy, also need I remind you abortion became a states right issue (something biden could have prevented) under bidens presidency?

The stupidest move is to play.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're oversimplifying.

Under Trump, Democrats would oppose genocide. I guarantee if Trump was president the Democrats would be fighting against him.

Under Biden, even Bernie is falling in line. It's disgusting.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

But would you rather have the bad guys do genocide or the good guys do genocide?

🤔

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They're there to sheepdog the voters into believing progressive candidates a valued part of the democratic party despite the fact that more than most of the good things progressives have accomplished are entirely outside of the chambers of congress. The democrats refuse to work with progressives unless they are forced too, like that time the progressives asked Pelosi to consider stock trading bans and she denied them until it was clear that was horrible PR, then decided to around to vocally supporting it later, once the political will to pass the bill was dying down. Progressives are there for show.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, Bernie is demonstrating this by refusing to endorse a ceasefire.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They already did. Though they absolutely 100% need to stop voting for that dogshit party as well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ah yes, insurrectionist part II electric boogaloo.

The choices on the table are dogshit or arsonic, but if you don’t choose you're still going to have to eat one of them.

In order to avoid eating either, we should probably focus on getting the one off the table that will fucking kill you.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just don't eat either of them? It's not hard. You simply go eat something else and ridicule people who are eating the dogshit.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The fuck are you going to do? Buy a submarine and live like captain goddamn nemo?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That would be cool. But no I'm just not going to eat dog shit. Millions of other foods, and hundreds of other candidates, I don't get any bonus points by voting for the winner. It's literally the least you can do.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Biden is the president whether or not you individually voted for him. You're figuratively eating dogshit right now. Be glad it isn't arsonic.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is the type of message needed to inspire good democrat turnout