this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
287 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13521 readers
164 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If not for the pandemic, he wouldn't have done any of it. It wasn't a particular position of Trump's to give that money, he just was in the position to do so at a time of crisis.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The intent doesn't change the reality. If your kid only had food to eat because of a Trump policy and you're presented with a choice between him and a nigh-identical ancient piece of shit, which one do you think you're going to pull the lever for?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Nigh identical ancient piecee of shit that let the expanded child tax credits expire putting you back to where your kids couldn't depend on having food*

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I agree 100%, people won't understand why things happened, they'll just know that they got money from one old weird fucker and got that money taken away by another old weird fucker.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But how many people are going to see it that way vs just “Trump instated these programs that helped us, Biden took them away.”?

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago

Very few. Talking to rural Americans and a common thing they'll say is, "I remember the economy being a lot better under Trump."

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago

It's not like the pandemic stopped under Biden, we just decided to pretend it did.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago

Material conditions!