▲ 1241 ▼ Alabama Mayor Kills Self After Right-Wing Blog Outs His Cross-Dressing (www.thedailybeast.com) submitted 2 years ago by Haus@kbin.social to c/news@lemmy.world 454 comments fedilink hide all child comments Bubba Copeland shot himself in front of police on Friday, days after he begged 1819 News not to expose his private life.
[–] RIPandTERROR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago (2 children) Mmmmmmmm... No, you know what? fuck that. You don't get to be a bigot and then expect privacy in your own life. Response to even if one is a bigot permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Exactly. This is classic conservative rules for thee bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) This is classic conservative rules for thee bullshit. This is anti-conservatives sinking to the level of conservative rules for thee bullshit. You're literally saying "it's ok to be queer, unless..." Either it's ok, it it's not. Spoiler alert, it's fucking ok. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Yes I'm saying it's ok to be queer and not ok to be intolerant. What the fuck is wrong with your reading comprehension? No one is saying that it is ok that he was outed. They're saying he was making rules as a Republican official that bound LGBTQ people and the instant those rules would apply to him he killed himself.. Rules for thee but not me. Do u get it now, junior? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) No one is saying that it is ok that he was outed. Plenty of people are saying exactly that. Are you reading a different thread? Do u get it now, junior? Go back to Reddit, you muppet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Uk u lost when you resort to "go back to reddit" followed by an ad hominem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago Typical Redditor. Thinking every insult is ad hominem. You don't get to start throwing insults around and not expect some in return. permalink fedilink source parent [–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) You don't get to be a bigot and then expect privacy in your own life. You have it exactly backwards though. You don't get to expect privacy in your own life if you refuse to respect the privacy of others. Also, why would you fight bigotry by demeaning the very thing they oppose with their bigotry? You're only adding fuel to the fire. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RIPandTERROR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Paradox of intolerance. Your argument is invalid. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Wrong. You don't have to tolerate bigotry to respect sexual privacy. You have no argument. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Exactly. This is classic conservative rules for thee bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) This is classic conservative rules for thee bullshit. This is anti-conservatives sinking to the level of conservative rules for thee bullshit. You're literally saying "it's ok to be queer, unless..." Either it's ok, it it's not. Spoiler alert, it's fucking ok. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Yes I'm saying it's ok to be queer and not ok to be intolerant. What the fuck is wrong with your reading comprehension? No one is saying that it is ok that he was outed. They're saying he was making rules as a Republican official that bound LGBTQ people and the instant those rules would apply to him he killed himself.. Rules for thee but not me. Do u get it now, junior? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) No one is saying that it is ok that he was outed. Plenty of people are saying exactly that. Are you reading a different thread? Do u get it now, junior? Go back to Reddit, you muppet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Uk u lost when you resort to "go back to reddit" followed by an ad hominem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago Typical Redditor. Thinking every insult is ad hominem. You don't get to start throwing insults around and not expect some in return. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) This is classic conservative rules for thee bullshit. This is anti-conservatives sinking to the level of conservative rules for thee bullshit. You're literally saying "it's ok to be queer, unless..." Either it's ok, it it's not. Spoiler alert, it's fucking ok. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Yes I'm saying it's ok to be queer and not ok to be intolerant. What the fuck is wrong with your reading comprehension? No one is saying that it is ok that he was outed. They're saying he was making rules as a Republican official that bound LGBTQ people and the instant those rules would apply to him he killed himself.. Rules for thee but not me. Do u get it now, junior? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) No one is saying that it is ok that he was outed. Plenty of people are saying exactly that. Are you reading a different thread? Do u get it now, junior? Go back to Reddit, you muppet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Uk u lost when you resort to "go back to reddit" followed by an ad hominem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago Typical Redditor. Thinking every insult is ad hominem. You don't get to start throwing insults around and not expect some in return. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Yes I'm saying it's ok to be queer and not ok to be intolerant. What the fuck is wrong with your reading comprehension? No one is saying that it is ok that he was outed. They're saying he was making rules as a Republican official that bound LGBTQ people and the instant those rules would apply to him he killed himself.. Rules for thee but not me. Do u get it now, junior? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) No one is saying that it is ok that he was outed. Plenty of people are saying exactly that. Are you reading a different thread? Do u get it now, junior? Go back to Reddit, you muppet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Uk u lost when you resort to "go back to reddit" followed by an ad hominem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago Typical Redditor. Thinking every insult is ad hominem. You don't get to start throwing insults around and not expect some in return. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) No one is saying that it is ok that he was outed. Plenty of people are saying exactly that. Are you reading a different thread? Do u get it now, junior? Go back to Reddit, you muppet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Uk u lost when you resort to "go back to reddit" followed by an ad hominem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago Typical Redditor. Thinking every insult is ad hominem. You don't get to start throwing insults around and not expect some in return. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Uk u lost when you resort to "go back to reddit" followed by an ad hominem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago Typical Redditor. Thinking every insult is ad hominem. You don't get to start throwing insults around and not expect some in return. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago Typical Redditor. Thinking every insult is ad hominem. You don't get to start throwing insults around and not expect some in return. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) You don't get to be a bigot and then expect privacy in your own life. You have it exactly backwards though. You don't get to expect privacy in your own life if you refuse to respect the privacy of others. Also, why would you fight bigotry by demeaning the very thing they oppose with their bigotry? You're only adding fuel to the fire. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RIPandTERROR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Paradox of intolerance. Your argument is invalid. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Wrong. You don't have to tolerate bigotry to respect sexual privacy. You have no argument. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RIPandTERROR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Paradox of intolerance. Your argument is invalid. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Wrong. You don't have to tolerate bigotry to respect sexual privacy. You have no argument. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Wrong. You don't have to tolerate bigotry to respect sexual privacy. You have no argument. permalink fedilink source parent