this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
1641 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

59299 readers
4364 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
1641
Chrome not proceeding with Web Integrity API deemed by many to be DRM (9to5google.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
252 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The Chrome team says they're not going to pursue Web Integrity but...

it is piloting a new Android WebView Media Integrity API that’s “narrowly scoped, and only targets WebViews embedded in apps.”

They say its because the team "heard your feedback." I'm sure that's true, and I can wildly speculate that all the current anti-trust attention was a factor too.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

UI/UX/Performance/Mobile app/Slow on Linux/Mozilla (the latter is the worst)

I'm not open to further debate. You asked, I replied. I preferred to migrate to a different browser and never look back, thanks to Mozilla.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your info isn't up to date

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah, sure /s.

Fuck Mozilla, really. I wouldn't go back to FF even if it was the last browser on earth, as long as it gives oxygen to Mozilla. I'd like Moz Corp. to disappear.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If Mozilla were to disappear, Chromium web engine would have a true monopoly. Seeing how bad things are getting with their almost monopoly, I'd like to help avoid that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I do understand this feeling. It's how I felt when I first left Firefox for Chrome. I would check in every few years for about 10-15 years and see if I was still better off on Chrome, and I was. But then one time, it just wasn't the case any more. I switched back to Firefox and now Chrome feels shitty, slow, and bloated to me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been using FF (and Thunderbird) for about 5 years now on my dual core old laptop running Gentoo, and it's always run pretty smooth. Especially when they switched to the Quantum web engine.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Of course. Everybody is having a great time on FF, that why this happens:

https://data.firefox.com/dashboard/user-activity

Yeah, surely Chrome/Google/$EandomEvilCorp are to blame, but Not Mozilla, the can't do anything wrong, poor souls /s

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I'm not arguing that people are switching to Firefox. I'm only saying that your argument about FF on Linux is just plain wrong.

I also prefer the UI/UX of FF over Chromium based browsers, but that's very subjective of course.