this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
21 points (100.0% liked)
..:: tchncs ::..
1305 readers
1 users here now
Your friendly https://tchncs.de community! Discuss whats happening in the tchncs world and/or just use it as a community forum.
German and english allowed.
If you are looking for a way to support tchncs, please check out https://tchncs.de/donate
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Threads has not implemented Federation yet.
I do not really understand all the fuss and fear about Threads. Either the content is good, then we should be happy and federate. Or it's bullshit/insults/racist/etc. crap - then we just block it.
Federation with threads could help threads to become the "default" home instance for most users. Then meta could pull the plug at any moment as most new communities would also run on threads. Threads could be the good old "Embrace, extend, and extinguish".
Wait and see until when? Like i get that i am a little "extreme" in my take but meta has a history with similar behavior and when it is too late, it is too late. Do we wait until it is too late?
have you any idea what google did to XMPP a while back? read this if no
In reality, Meta is not federating to pull the few people off the Fediverse. We are far too few to be of any relevance. Threads got twice the amount of users within a day. Soon they will dwarf the whole Fediverse even more.
The only reason why they announced to (and will) federate is to avoid anti trust problems. And that also means: If they pull the plug and defederate, they will immediately end up on investigation.
So, I rate this risk as very low.
Not everyone feels the same way though.
All opinions are valid, and we can all choose instances that align with our views, but for my part I won't support an instance that federated with meta just on principle.