292
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 27 points 2 years ago

I remember in school when we had US history for the sixth time for social studies class, they taught us again about the early debates in the Federalist Papers on how the baby democracy might turn into a monster by allowing the majority to win votes somehow

Obviously it's better to have a tyranny of the minority than the tyranny of the majority, some dead guy in a wig said so

[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

So, if democracy is bad....then why not adopt technocracy and not let those rubes anywhere near a position of power?

The American Medical Association, after extensive research, has found that me being trans is not a sign there's anything wrong with me. Who cares if 99% of this shithole wants me dead? Experts say I'm fine and that's all that matters. Not my fault most people are unthinking morons.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

The AMA is run by insurance companies and hospitals, most physicians have never belonged to it

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

Designing the optimal governing system is idealist, but I do admit I am interested in the topic. My picks are sociocracy and liquid democracy, which might be described like a crossover between direct democracy and technocratic representation

In the end though, it's dependent on material conditions how we should organize ourselves

this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
292 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22689 readers
352 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to The Labour Community.

Take any slop posts to the slop trough

Main is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS