this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
36 points (71.4% liked)

Asklemmy

43403 readers
996 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Asking for a friend.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

you can't trust it was killed for a legitimate reason

I'm probably being a little facetious here, I think I kind of get what you meant, but isn't the whole reason "to sell it to someone who wants to eat it" regardless of which one was killed?

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Like, if it was it was road kill (?) or something. Maybe a conservationist came into the possession of a freshly dead sturgeon and wants OP to cook it. I dunno, I've had similar things happen, I posted about the time I got to try kopi luwak here.

Otherwise, no, it's farmed or you're SOL. Eating endangered animals is generally agreed to be a dick move.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Like, if it was it was road kill (?) or something

I keep running into sturgeons in my car. Hate when that happens.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Hmm, I bet that would mess up your tires. They have tooth-like scales IIRC. It could be for research or some other kind of accident, I guess. The point being that it wasn't a kill for food purposes.

Lemmy punishes being inexact so much ("ACKTUALLY") I have to admit I'm a bit butthurt people are coming after me for mentioning the only edge case.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I'm not sure I understand. I'm speaking specifically about this particular situation you mentioned : what's the difference in terms of legitimacy between the two kills, if both were made to be sold to feed someone else?

I understand the legal aspect, like endangered species protections, etc, but that's another topic entirely. Or is it actually not and you actually meant "legality"?

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The point would be it was killed for unrelated reasons, and then is made available post-mortem for consumption somehow. And verifiably so!

As for the ethics:

Eating endangered animals is generally agreed to be a dick move.

I feel like that sums it up pretty well. I don't know OP but I'd bet money that they would agree it's to be avoided, so that's the light I answered the question in.

If this is a vegetarian thing, I did make a mention of that in my OP. Dispensing a lecture instead of answering the spirit of the question would have been unhelpful.