this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
274 points (95.7% liked)

Science Memes

10905 readers
1426 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
274
Utterly terrifying (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's actually an interesting question, how many of the atoms we have today are directly from the big bang?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

All of them :)

Edit: Or none depending on how you see it. No atoms were formed directly at the Big Bang because too hot, but all atoms' existence is a pretty direct consequence of it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

If that's the case I would say none then. The constitute parts aren't the item. (How many ships are produced by a forest? None, we use the wood to make the ships.)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All of them? At what point do we consider new atom formation to not be a part of the big bang? Isn't it still ongoing, at least until expansion and atomic formation stops?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I would consider a sun forming new atoms to not be atoms from the big bang.