this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
70 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

5 readers
1 users here now

@politics on kbin.social is a magazine to share and discuss current events news, opinion/analysis, videos, or other informative content related to politicians, politics, or policy-making at all levels of governance (federal, state, local), both domestic and international. Members of all political perspectives are welcome here, though we run a tight ship. Community guidelines and submission rules were co-created between the Mod Team and early members of @politics. Please read all community guidelines and submission rules carefully before engaging our magazine.

founded 2 years ago
 

Terry A. Doughty says he gets to decide who the FBI, DHS, HHS, and the Justice Department can talk to.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm really conflicted here. If conservatives insist on killing themselves by being anti-science, I should support their right to die as they insist.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

But I don't support their burden on shared resources (hospitals) on their way out. So many people who don't subscribe to those conspiracy theorist views died as collateral damage during the pandemic because the hospitals didn't have the resources to support all of their usual burdens plus the wave of COVID-ill vaccine deniers.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let people opt out of services for a very small tax incentive, it will be hilarious schadenfreude.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No no no no no nope not even as a joke.

If you can financially gain from opting out, very poor people will have no choice but to opt out and risk it. Proven time and time again. People should not be allowed to waive their rights for petty personal gains. Your rights are unwaivable, that's what makes them rights.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your rights are absolutely able to be waived, they just can't be taken away. It's a subtle but meaningful difference.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

If you're being compensated to waive them, you aren't waiving them freely. So it's being taken away.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

That's a fair point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's entirely valid but not the same as "your rights are unwaivable".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Agreed on the whole thing up until "your rights are unwaivable". If that were the case then those are not your rights to begin with. Freedom includes the freedom to abstain.