Unixporn

15359 readers

1 users here now

Unixporn

Submit screenshots of all your *NIX desktops, themes, and nifty configurations, or submit anything else that will make themers happy. Maybe a server running on an Amiga, or a Thinkpad signed by Bjarne Stroustrup? Show the world how pretty your computer can be!

Rules

Post On-Topic
No Defaults
Busy Screenshots
Use High-Quality Images
Include a Details Comment
No NSFW
No Racism or use of racist terms

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

129

[DWM] true minimalism (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Editor: Vimacs (Most feature-full neovim distro)

PDF: Sioyek

Distro: Arch

WM: dwm

Terminal: ST

Fetch: BunnyFetch

LS: logo-ls

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dotfiles?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

(Sorry, I'm pedantic, but.)

DWM isn't configured with dotfiles. It's configured by editing a C header file and recompiling.

Not to say camel_case couldn't share the C header file they used, of course. And of course other programs he mentioned are configured with dotfiles.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I mean, I definitely consider my patched DWM as part of my dotfiles, just one that happens to be compiled. And if I can 1-up your pedantry, mine is in .local so it is literally in my "dot"files :P.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

But other things are controlled with dotfiles