Technology

59232 readers

3198 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

557

You cant even avoid irrelevant results with "site:" anymore (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

157 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Same here. DDG is so much better. And I love that I can do !mcwiki diamond to search the minecraft wiki for "diamonds"

I ended up switching because Google changed their image search design that was just so much more difficult to browse

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My problem with ddg is that I can't refine my search by excluding keywords, only by adding more. For example, it's frustrating if I'm looking to buy a product locally and half the page is Amazon results.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If I add -amazon to the query on ddg I don't get any Amazon results. Is this not the case for you?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is not. It works fine for google, but not for DDG.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That is weird. I wonder why we are seeing so different behavior from ddg.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You can do that on ddg. See this link: http://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/syntax