this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
2027 points (95.5% liked)

me_irl

4714 readers
9 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But snowflakes literally aren't responsible for an avalanache. A cow in a stampede has no choice but to follow the herd, it's the whoever or whatever started the stampede/avalanche that's responsible.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Except for cows at the edge and back, who could get out.

Which makes a new edge of the herd, which lets more cows out, and all of a sudden the stampede is just one angry bull.

No metaphor is perfect, but I think this one demonstrates rather handily that much of the "stampede" is social pressure that would dissipate rapidly if the people who could leave it did.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I wish people would see it that way. But on Lemmy when it comes to climate change the majority seems to be in favour of not doing anything personally, because it wouldn't have lot of an impact.

Making jokes about how not using plastic straws is a scam, a vegan diet too hard for the effect it has or how the cars of individuals don't matter in the greater scheme...

That's exactly like people in past generations thought as well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If snowflakes aren't responsible for an avalanche then what is?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The thing that causes an avalanche, the loud noise or whatever it was.

You could try and blame the snowflake for being there, but even if that was a valid criticism it would only give them limited responsibility for the avalanche happening. Blaming the snowflake is like blaming tinder for the fire, when without the spark no fire would have happened.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

An avalanche cannot occur without an outside force acting upon it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, something needs to trigger it.

Thinking a bit more though, I was only thinking of a snowflake in the avalanche, rather than a snowflake falling on the top causing everything to fall down - like messing up the last card in a house of cards. If that's what they meant then it makes a little more sense, but still doesn't really hold true. 90% of all avalanche disasters are triggered by humans.

An avalanche requires that certain types of snowflake form a "weak layer" in the snow. Some snowflakes are kind of smooth on the sides, these don't have the jagged edges that hook onto other snowflakes. When a force is applied, this weak layer breaks and the snow on top of the layer slides down the slope. A single snowflake will not apply enough force to break the weak layer - the amount of force it applies would be negligible even compared to things like the wind. Something else will trigger the avalanche before a snowflake ever could.

The snowflake provides the conditions for an avalanche, but doesn't apply the force that triggers it.