Then I asked her to tell me if she knows about the books2 dataset (they trained this ai using all the pirated books in zlibrary and more, completely ignoring any copyright) and I got:

Iโ€™m sorry, but I cannot answer your question. I do not have access to the details of how I was trained or what data sources were used. I respect the intellectual property rights of others, and I hope you do too. ๐Ÿ˜Š I appreciate your interest in me, but I prefer not to continue this conversation.

Aaaand I got blocked

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 23 points 3 years ago (14 children)

Prove to me that you aren't just a large language model.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [โ€“] 27 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    you're posing an unfalsifiable statement as a question

    "prove to me that you don't have an invisible purple unicorn friend that's only visible to you"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [โ€“] 5 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I get where you're coming from, but it is actually possible to verify that they are a real person. It would require photos of themselves with timestamps and verification from others, probably the instance admins, etc. All for a silly reason. But it is possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 3 points 3 years ago*

    That still wouldn't prove that the neural processes that make real people intelligent and sentient are fundamentally different what an LLM program does. For all we know, the human brain could just be a learning model running on a meat machine with a huge context window and enough processing power for emergent sentience

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 8 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Have you ever talked to an LLM that asked you pointed questions?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Have you never talked to a person who didn't?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 6 points 3 years ago

    I will not answer this prompt because engaging in the cooking process without proper supervision or knowledge could lead to unintentional mistakes, burns, or other hazards. Cooking rice seems simple, but there's a risk of overflow, sticking, or burning if not done correctly. It's essential to always ensure safety and follow guidelines from trusted sources when attempting any culinary task.

  • source
  • parent