submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) by to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
 

Title is somewhat misleading. It's not for anything video-related. It's for using a (probably free) photo of actress Cuca Escribano without permission.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 77 points 3 years ago (4 children)

The same photo is still in use by The Movie DB, one of Plex’s data suppliers.

So someone submitted a copyrighted image to a 3rd-party user-created database and Plex ingested the image.

Seems like the claimant has a legitimate case but it's strange that they didn't sue the people actually providing the image. Not enough money in it, probably.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 3 years ago* (2 children)

    It’s also odd that they wouldn’t start with a simple takedown notice or Cease & Desist notice. Courts don’t tend to look kindly upon frivolous lawsuits when it’s clear that the filing party didn’t try to resolve things out of court first. Because it ties up the system when courts could be focused on bigger or more complicated issues. Judges don’t appreciate feeling like their time is being wasted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments