submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) by to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
 

Title is somewhat misleading. It's not for anything video-related. It's for using a (probably free) photo of actress Cuca Escribano without permission.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 26 points 3 years ago (5 children)

Most people use the service for perfectly legitimate purposes.

But also, the copyright infringement is for using a picture of an actress on their website; the photographer who took the photo usually licenses it for third party use, and Plex didn't have permission to use it.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    But also, the copyright infringement is for injesting automatically from a third party a picture of an actress on their website

    FTFY

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago (3 children)