516
TikTok ran a deepfake ad of an AI MrBeast hawking iPhones for $2 — and it's the 'tip of the iceberg' (www.businessinsider.com)
submitted 3 years ago by [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world
131 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

TikTok ran a deepfake ad of an AI MrBeast hawking iPhones for $2 — and it's the 'tip of the iceberg'::As AI spreads, it brings new challenges for influencers like MrBeast and platforms like TikTok aiming to police unauthorized advertising.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 3 years ago (10 children)

And that is why we need a pixel poisoner but for videos.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 19 points 3 years ago (9 children)

    I’m not familiar with the term, and Google shows nothing that makes sense in context. Can you explain the concept?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    Yeah I'm at a loss aswell. Is it a way to prove the source of a video?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    Its AI poison. You alter the data in such a way that the image is unchanged to a humans visual eye, but when imaging AI software uses the image within its sample imaging, the alterations ruin its ability to make correlations and recognize patterns.

    Its toxic for the entire data set too, so it can damage the AI output of most things as long as its within the list of images used to train the AI.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (4 children)

    That seems about as effective as those No-AI pictures artists like to pretend will poison AI data sets. A few pixels isn't going to fool AI, and anything more than that is going to look like a real image was AI-generated, ironically.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    It can seem like whatever you want it to, its already been used and has poisoned data sets.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (2 children)

    Wake me up when orgs like Stability AI or Open AI bitch about this technology. As it stands now, it's not even worth mentioning, and people are freely generating whatever pictures, models, deepfakes, etc. that they want.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 3 years ago

    Why would they openly bitch about it? Thats free advertising that it works. Not to mention, you cant poison food someone already ate. They already have full sets of scrubbed data they can revert to if they add a batch thats been poisoned. They just need to be cautious about newly added data.

    Its not worth mentioning if you dont understand the tech, sure. But for people who make content that is publicly viewable, this is pretty important.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent