this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
1221 points (98.3% liked)

Memes

45608 readers
969 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The cost to construct a new rail connection is significantly higher than the cost to construct a new road connection.

Correct. Now compare the cost of maintenance, and then compare the cost of actually moving the items.

Let's see which comes out on top when we compare all costs, not just the cost of building.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

rail lines are also more expensive than roads to maintain

the cost of moving your items depends entirely on how many items you move—sometimes roads will be cheaper, and sometimes rails will be cheaper

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

rail lines are also more expensive than roads to maintain

That's because they transport more material than roads.

The NZ government did a thought experiment where they shifted all rail to road, and the maintenance costs would increase by $105 million.

Keep in mind the rail system in NZ is underdeveloped.

Source: https://www.kiwirail.co.nz/assets/Uploads/documents/2021-Value-of-Rail-report.pdf

If you want to shift the most materials from one place to another at the cheapest rate, you would use rail.

the cost of moving your items depends entirely on how many items you move—sometimes roads will be cheaper, and sometimes rails will be cheaper

Do you mean cost to the end consumer or actual expenditure? Are you including CAPEX? What are you actually talking about?