this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
42 points (93.8% liked)

Fediverse

28339 readers
192 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

To support decentralization and spread, should lemmy.world close registration at some point to prevent a performance overload due to too many users? Of course, if registration is disabled, there could be a hint placed somewhere near that from other instances you can interact with content on lemmy.world just like you had registered on it. There could be a link to join-lemmys instance overview.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Depends on server loads and scaling.

If the engineer(s) and admin(s) running things can handle the costs associated with growth then I think it should stay open. However at a certain point the load on the infrastructure, sysadmins, and cost make that untenable.

It’s not cheap to run this kind of stuff. I know that first hand because of my career running HPC clusters and running them in cloud environments.

I’ve got a pretty solid idea of what this must be costing and I’m really thankful that someone is putting in the thankless labor of love. That’s why I canceled my Reddit premium and started donating to this instance to help with that in some way. The only other way I could help is donating my time & experience. But I think they need money more than engineers lol

The TL;DR is that if we want to keep these things online we need to donate money (and/or time/labor).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Funilly enough, apparently they have enough server power and the bottleneck is the software. Or so I was told.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This is the one of the best takes here. It's a delicate balance. Performance, cost, and manageability. Fail in any of these, and it doesn't matter, you'll either lose access to the site or be unable to manage it.

If staffing or money are insufficient, the site should do what's necessary for survival, but only just before that threshold is exceeded. Users are important, but self destruction is not an option.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Even as a small instance operator, the media storage increases at a pretty steady rate. It's probably going to be a case of months or even years before it starts getting to costing money I will notice. But, still I guess we can by then start to purge very old stuff if we're not a big instance though.