this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
533 points (92.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

9607 readers
447 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not all shoes are so limited, you can buy shoes that have plenty of lifespan such as Brooks running shoes. I’ve put hundreds of miles on mine and they’re still in good shape. That being said with planned obsolescence and cheap manufacturing for fast turnover being prioritized, we end up with less reliable shoes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's why I wrote "the vast majority"??

And hundreds of miles, before you throw away a pair of shoes, my... Look, that might mean much to a Northern American who drives everywhere.

"Hundreds of miles" is what I actually run each year, and then I get lots of hiking and just walking around on top of that. I guess I can measure my Redwings and Hanwag in tens of thousands kilometers each, and my Lundhags I could pass down if I had kids.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m not sure I was disagreeing with you in the previous statement. I haven’t thrown my shoes I’ve only put hundreds of miles on yet.

My point is that it isn’t exactly easy to find good shoes unless you invest a lot of money into them, especially in North America since we’re specifying locales. Most stores, even specialty stores, don’t carry custom-made or handmade shoes that are re-soleable. You could blame that on car-dependency, but it’s more likely due to an overall lack of understanding why one would need shoes that last much longer. People spend their money on cheaper, shorter-life shoes because they don’t have that much money to begin with.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I’m not sure I was disagreeing with you in the previous statement

Then don't repeat things I explicitly mentioned, as if I said something else?

Also get better examples. Brooks break down as easy as Asics, Saucony, whatever. They are exactly the "single use" product I spoke about, making the shoe and clothing industry in general highly non carbon neutral, which was my point.

it isn’t exactly easy to find good shoes unless you invest a lot of money into them

Yes, it's called the Sam Vimes "Boots" theory of socioeconomic unfairness.

You could blame that on car-dependency

I don't blame that on anything but capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hundreds of miles? I've walked/run hundreds of miles on my ~$10usd shoes and they're still holding together. I would expect a expensive pair to manage thousands or ten-thousands of miles.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You have also probably done irreparable damage to your feet, ankles and knees with those $10 shoes that will become apparent as you age.

Dont.Buy.Cheap.Shoes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Idk man, some people wear high heels. $10 shoes can't be worse than that.