you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 15 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

If the American owner class has taught Americans paying any attention the last century anything about how they operate, it's "Fuck the commons/planet/species/future, burn it all if it makes me a dollar slightly faster!"

Profit in this case being all the corporate park land they own. Propagating human misery at every step for nothing more than to run up their capital ego score, that doesn't even effect their living conditions at all.

Good thing they don't consider their victims, people without significant net worth, human.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Does it even make them any money if someone is inside the building? It seems more like justifying a purchase that didn't pan out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago

    It's about holding value for them. Small/medium businesses paying rent in perpetuity to the corporate owners of business complexes. Yes, they'd rather others suffer and the planet burn if it means their capital investment is reaping dividends.

    That's why we're on the brink, it's not like man made climate change hasn't been known for half a century. Our owners only care about their capital scores. They destroyed our republic and captured our government that was supposed to regulate/check them for us to increase their capital scores. They're destroying the climate and hobbling the species for generations to increase their capital scores.

    Why does everyone act surprised when our owner class acts like sociopaths? Thats why they're in our owner class to begin with. Welcome to America, where practiced sociopathy gets you a corner office, and practiced prosocial vocations and empathy gets you a cardboard box on the sidewalk.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/18/the-wealthiest-10percent-of-americans-own-a-record-89percent-of-all-us-stocks.html

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    Corporate real estate is over represented in investments, so the loss is through the stock market, not the company directly

    Edit: I actually don’t know if that’s true, but it’s the theory

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    While a lot of people work for big companies that may have commercial real estate holdings or are invested in REITs or something, most companies pulling workers back are not. And, indeed, they're run by people that are choosing to pay for the privilege of lording their station over the hired help -- though not to the employees, and many of them not purposefully.

    They're just taking productivity hits while swearing up and down that we're all lazy thieves who don't do a thing all day while not in the panopticon.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    No, but it makes the cities where those buildings reside a boatload of tax revenue. I wouldn't be surprised to find out that a lot of the "return to office" propaganda was coming from local governments freaking out about the abrupt downturn in tax income from commuters.

  • source
  • parent