10
Life may have triggered plate tectonics. (agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com)
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Photoferrotrophic Bacteria Initiated Plate Tectonics in the Neoarchean

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

what the fuck, that's wild. also first time I've seen an article include one of these ( how plain the Language is is up for debate)
.

Plain Language Summary

Plate tectonics provides a basic framework for understanding geological processes on Earth. Although the subduction of cold and heavy oceanic lithosphere can maintain the operation of plate tectonics, its initiation mechanism remains unclear. To reveal the origin mystery of plate tectonics, it is necessary to clarify how and when the first subduction on Earth began. In this study, we propose a hypothetical model that links Earth's biological processes with the origin of plate tectonics. In the photic zone of the Neoarchean continental margins, the anaerobic metabolism of photoferrotrophic bacteria greatly promoted the massive deposition of magnetite-rich banded iron formations (BIFs). Our mechanical calculations show that within an acceptable sedimentary thickness, these heavy BIF deposits can provide enough downward force to rupture the Neoarchean continental margins and initiate the earliest subduction. The peak deposition of BIFs in 2.75–2.4 Ga further implies the onset time of global plate tectonics.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Just hit me that (it true) this would have preceded the first of life's known major change to the environment, the Great Oxidation Event. So not only once but twice in an early era life totally disrupted the "normal" surroundings and caused utter chaos for existing life, which had to adapt to a new world. Next question, would these bacteria have been the same culprits?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

anaerobic metabolism of photoferrotrophic bacteria

Suggests no? Because the great oxidation was caused by the development of photosynthesis as used in chlorophil. Staring at this page on iron-oxidizing bacteria, none of the key reactions have elemental oxygen as a by-product. Definitely not an expert, could be reading this wrong.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

You did more research than I did, so more of an expert than me. Sounds like you're correct.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

their "plain" language is the reason for https://kbin.social/m/science/t/128163/-/comment/501383

ETA: The theory is indeed wild, and I had to read and share despite their attempt at 'plain language' .

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, definitely needed a real TLDR, thanks. This is one where I'd love like a quanta article to get perspective from folks in the field about how controversial this proposal actually is.

this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
10 points (100.0% liked)

Science

4 readers
6 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on scientific discoveries, research, and theories across various fields, including physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, and more. Whether you are a scientist, a science enthusiast, or simply curious about the world around us, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on a wide range of scientific topics. From the latest breakthroughs to historical discoveries and ongoing research, this category covers a wide range of topics related to science.

founded 2 years ago