I've been wondering this question for a while. Ignoring current events, why is a little bit of inflation desirable?

I do understand that it's done to "stimulate" the economy so people don't let their cash rot in a checking account, but isn't it a zero-sum game? Everybody says that money is not meant to stay where it is, rather, should flow through the economy. But if the economy always needs injections of liquidity because otherwise it fails, isn't the economy broken?

I feel like there's something I can't comprehend about that.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (8 children)

I don't understand why you call it worse, or even bad at all.

your money buys more tomorrow than today

This is evidently good.

you hold off spending it

Also good. Save money for retirement and emergencies.

Done en masse, that causes demand to drop

Less consumerism. Good again.

companies have to lower prices further

Still good. More acquisitive power for consumers, less money for CEOs, stockholders, and similar parasites.

More incentive to increase production efficiency and reduce waste, while proper regulations and actually punitive fines and civil and criminal responsibility for executives, board members, and stockholders keep salaries and quality up.

The concept of infinite growth has been raping and murdering the world for way too long. This looks like it would put a hard stop to it.

which means more deflation

So far so good?

It's a self-perpetuating cycle

Sounds great, to be honest!

(Though, to be fair, prices would only keep lowering until goods are sold for what they actually cost to produce, including salaries and whatnot, with occasional drops due to increased efficiencies; the system would thus stabilise at an actually reasonable level, as opposed to the current ultraconsumerist madness.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 14 minutes ago

    Less demand = people getting laid off because now there's not enough work -> increase in unemployed -> fewer people paying taxes and social security stuff -> government can spend less which often leads to cuts in social security programs -> people can spend even less -> demand for products and services drops even further -> more layoffs -> cycle repeats

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

    You need to think more communally.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 16 hours ago* (3 children)

    Not wanting parasites to keep burning the world for short term profit is not thinking communally..?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 16 hours ago (1 child)

    That's obviously not what I'm referring to. I ignored the environmental stuff as I don't want to get off topic. Your points aren't invalid, but they are off topic. Try to focus please.

    Back to the actual economics we're talking about. You're thinking only about the money going into your pocket. You're not thinking about the functioning of society as a whole. And you're not looking more than two inches in front of your face. The deflationary cycle is also self-perpetuating because it also involves cutting demand for not just goods, but labor. Look at the Great Depression if you want to see what a deflationary spiral looks like.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment