this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
358 points (92.4% liked)
Asklemmy
43945 readers
592 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That's my point though. Thinking your subscription fees are rewarding content creators is daft.
Does this apply to Patreon? I don't think of that as daft. I think many content creators rely on it.
If you're supporting someone on Patreon, you're not really purchasing their content from a third party, are you?
I was really replying to the subscription fee comment. I can imagine a scenario where someone is subscribing to a CC's Patreon but pirating their content (or just streaming it without ads with an ad blocker). ETA: So that the CC solely gets the money, not the publisher/hosting service.
No, I support a few podcasts on patreon. Payments direct to creators is a much better model and I'm happy to support it. I meant "subscription fee" as in streaming services.