56
Can somedy explain to me the issue with the voter ID law they want to pass in the US? (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 10 hours ago by to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
71 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

First things first, I don't doubt it is a bad thing, considering who supports it and who doesn't.

But my question is what exactly is the issue and what is the current and proposed voting process when it comes to IDs?

Here in my EU country, you have to show some version of a government ID, be it an ID card, drivers license or passport. And we don't have to pre-register to vote.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (4 children)

When you are born or move, you have to register at the municipality. Then when it comes time for the elections, you get a voting pass in the mail a couple weeks before. On the day of the election, you just take your pass and any form of government ID (either current, or expired no more than 5 years ago) to a polling station in you municipality and vote.

If you cannot go yourself, you can send another person with your voting pass and a copy of your ID. But usually, the polling places are very close to where you live and easily accessible by walking, biking or public transport.

If you live abroad, you just get a mail in ballot that you send back by mail.

This is in my country of course. Others are probably slightly different.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 5 hours ago* (3 children)

    Ok, that's kind of what I expected.

    So, one way to look at the US system is that the US as a whole corresponds in a way to the EU. Individual states in the US would correspond to EU countries.

    Of course, there are certainly differences. But in some ways individual US states are treated as separate, sovereign entities. The US Constitution leaves all management of elections up to the individual states. There aren't really federal elections (well, apart from the electoral college, but let's not get into that). There are state elections to fill federal offices. It is seen by most as inappropriate for the federal government to get involved in US elections.

    When you ask why the US doesn't have a national ID, it's like asking why citizens of EU countries aren't required to have an EU ID. It's more appropriate to ask why individual states don't have state IDs.

    As you can imagine, there are 50 different variations on what the rules for such an ID would be.

    However, the biggest issue with having any kind of required, state-issued ID is resistance to giving the government more ability to track us. This despite the most virulently anti-surveillance people regularly updating their most intimate details in Facebook and Instagram.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 hours ago

    EU does mandate how the national ID cards must look and what data must be written on them. It does not mandate that they have to exist, though. But in practice they do exist everywhere, and they look just the same anywhere in EU.

    In UK they either don't have a national ID at all, or almost nobody has it. But it's not relevant here because it's not an EU country.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 3 points 5 hours ago (1 child)

    That's interesting. Though one thing I will add is that IDs from any EU country is accepted by all other EU countries. I actually don't live in the EU country I am from, and before voting with my drivers license on local elections, I voted with my passport from my own country. Ah and another thing is that you can only vote for the local elections if you are not a citizen, even if you are from another EU country.

    So in many ways, I think there is more interoperability between EU countries than between US states. Even with drivers licenses is very flexible. Where I am, you have to exchange it for a local drivers license within 15 years of moving (though you have 4 month to resgiter a car with plates from another country). In some cases even things like unemployment and disability pension continues being paid if you move countries.

    As for the tracking, I agree with you for the latter part. People don't realize how much they are being tracked and exploited by mega corps. Anyway, even without a state or federal ID there, you still have to pay taxes and whatnot, so its not like the government has any less info about you. It just becomes an additional way to male life harder for low income people, because it raises the barrier of entry for support from the government.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 4 hours ago

    States have some reciprocity, the recognizing of another state's license as it's own, but if isn't always universal. For instance, the USA is going through a two decade plus upgrade to driver's licenses and non-license ID's to include proof of citizenship because a lot of states dragged their feet in implementing the additional filing systems required. Even then, states are still allowed to issue non-compliant ID's and people will get them because they don't want to spend the extra time to get them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent