you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Oh yep. Should probably read the comments before just commenting myself.

I wonder if they were a little experimental because the Qing were trying to modernise their military and largely failing at it, so there could've been a lot of experimental weapons they were testing to see if it would give them an advantage?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    I think this wasn't really a military weapon, more of a police/civilian thing. The Qing modernization attempts were mostly copying Western military methodology, although I guess that was more towards the 1900s so before that they may have tried some weirder stuff

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Yeah, it's an era I wouldn't really associate with a lot of experimentation, more just trying to emulate the west, though I don't really know a whole lot about the Qing in the 18th century, so I don't know how useful something like this might've been. If there aren't really a lot of them and they aren't written about much, it's probably a sign that they weren't really useful beyond some niche cases.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 4 points 2 days ago

    The ones which are just a regular rod, without a fancy head, do actually have a decent amount of examples, and the Okinawan variety, the sai, is one of the weapons in their traditional martial arts. So those at least are well-attested to.

    This crescent-head one was perhaps someone trying to iterate on the concept and add some extra hooking and/or striking opportunities, but it seems like it didn't catch on.

  • source
  • parent