you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 0 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

Yes of course. But during WW1 alliances really weren't stable when you look at a bigger picture. It was much more opportunistic than ww2. Germany vs Austria, Austria vs Ottomans, British Empire vs Russia, British vs French.

Latter we had this more homogeneous allied block.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 19 hours ago (4 children)

    I am not aware of any inner-alliance battles fought during WW1. And I don't think there were any. But if you know more than that and can provide sources, please, I am always interested in learning new things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 0 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

    These wars were preceding WW1. But of course weren't nowhere as big. 19th century was eventful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 9 hours ago (2 children)

    Yes, there were wars before WW1. But those were not WW1 and you cant say "WW1 was free for all among Empires" based on events that were not WW1. WW1 was not "free for all", there were clear alliances that held all war long. Your claim is bullshit and you should correct it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments