Let's reread what they said:
It was just disappointing to know all those "Tree of liberty needs to be watered" folk were the real bootlickers all along.
That reads to me as: "The people who quote that line turned out to be the ones who support fascism." In other words, "The don't tread on me people turned out to enjoy being treaded on/treading on others."
Maybe you read it differently, but if my reading is correct, then I'd say the other commenter wasn't lying. Calling that "assuming everyone who thinks a state monopoly on violence is bad" is... a take...
Community is pretty much all I've got, ...
Okay. That's a privilege. If you think everyone in this country has that opportunity, you're assuming everyone is in a similar situation as your own, which is ignorant.
Do you think a trans person in Alabama could build community solidarity by an act of willpower alone? Or a gay man in Nebraska, or a lesbian woman in Utah, or a Latino person in Mississippi?
I'm assuming from your words that your neighbors are mostly anti-maga. Do you really think that's the norm everywhere in this country? Because if it was, we wouldn't be in this mess to begin with.
And by the way, are you assuming that the other commenter is a cishetero white man? Because if literally anyone else were to get out while they could, would you still be so opposed to it? I didn't see anything in their comment that indicates one way or another.
their attitude and the criticism coming down from such a privileged position got to me.
Let's look at the rest of their comment:
I knew they wouldn't do shit after J6.
Obviously talking about the government here, who failed to prosecute the leaders of that insurrection.
Glad I got out of the US
I would be too.
so I don't have to deal with that theocratic shit hole Reich that's embedding itself into government
They ain't wrong.
What about this sounds condescending to you?
You literally said there was no virtue, bravery, or solidarity in staying behind and doing so changed nothing, wish I could quote.
Doing so literally changes nothing, ergo there is no virtue or bravery in it, only stupidity (if it's done by choice when there's an alternative option, at least).
You might be able to argue that there can be solidarity in that, but it's the solidarity of crabs in the steamer. There's no shame in climbing overboard, but there is shame in dragging someone back down when they're trying to climb out. Not sure how you don't see that.
The tendency for anyone with the resources to do so to put the Rational Self Interest we're conditioned for above the needs of the many really doesn't help. They're in a much better position to help than I am and chose not to.
The cost of a plane ticket is not enough to fix this mess. Just because they got outta here doesn't mean they could have done anything to help even if they had stayed.
Not exactly operating from a position of power.
None of us are, dude. That's why some of us leave.
I've turned down opportunities for myself because of the position it would leave my community in more than once, it's what makes me a part of it and what lets me feel like a good person.
Would you do the same if 90% of your community were malicious, ignorant magas?