Attorney General Todd Blanche has declined to pledge DOJ’s independence from the White House and would not rule out similar suits in other states

Donald Trump says he ordered the Department of Justice to sue the state of Alaska in an effort to block the results of a U.S. Senate election from being certified, unless the incumbent Republican wins.

Government attorneys filed a lawsuit Friday arguing that the presence of Daniel J. Sullivan Jr. on the ballot would confuse voters who support the sitting senator, Daniel S. Sullivan, in the unusual matchup of two candidates with the same name up against a Democratic candidate.

“I’m the one that said do it,” Trump told reporters Friday. “They have two Dan Sullivans.”

Trump’s admission of an extraordinary intervention in the nation’s elections follows the president’s threats to overhaul election administration and assert federal control before critical midterm elections with the balance of power in Congress, and fate of his final years in office, at stake.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 18 hours ago (14 children)

This is honestly too much for me to reply to through a phone, so here's a few poorly articulated bullet points.

Assuming everyone who thinks a state monopoly on violence is bad is against you is idiotic and self defeating. Even on a reread (which I did before replying to you earlier and again just now) I'm pretty confident they're making the equally dumb assertation that there should have been an armed response to the J6 bullshit and that the lack thereof is somehow hypocritical.

It's expensive as hell to move at all, emigration moreso, and anyone able to make it out of here was doing pretty well in the first place to pull that off. Community is pretty much all I've got, and I build that every day through consistent participation. Whether I want to or not, because we need each other. It absolutely takes 'willpower' and has nothing at all to do with luck. That's exactly what makes it happen and the only thing that can.

Re: resentment? Nobody's perfect, said I couldn't help it, their attitude and the criticism coming down from such a privileged position got to me. You have no idea how life changing even the price of dude's plane ticket out itself would be down here. He's the crab who made it out and is kinda being a dick about it, where I'm committed to tipping the bucket if I want to live (solidarity/collective action is the only hope of pulling that off).

You literally said there was no virtue, bravery, or solidarity in staying behind and doing so changed nothing, wish I could quote.

The attempted callout is deeply hypocritical a couple lines after telling me not to make uncharitable assumptions, and I'm not about to dox myself to validate the efforts I make to you. Absolutely working my ass off to get myself and others through this though, despite often failing to do so. The tendency for anyone with the resources to do so to put the Rational Self Interest we're conditioned for above the needs of the many really doesn't help. They're in a much better position to help than I am and chose not to.

Begging, pleading, entreating would all be better words than demanding for whatever the hell it is I'm doing here. Not exactly operating from a position of power. I've turned down opportunities for myself because of the position it would leave my community in more than once, it's what makes me a part of it and what lets me feel like a good person.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 17 hours ago (13 children)

    Let's reread what they said:

    It was just disappointing to know all those "Tree of liberty needs to be watered" folk were the real bootlickers all along.

    That reads to me as: "The people who quote that line turned out to be the ones who support fascism." In other words, "The don't tread on me people turned out to enjoy being treaded on/treading on others."

    Maybe you read it differently, but if my reading is correct, then I'd say the other commenter wasn't lying. Calling that "assuming everyone who thinks a state monopoly on violence is bad" is... a take...

    Community is pretty much all I've got, ...

    Okay. That's a privilege. If you think everyone in this country has that opportunity, you're assuming everyone is in a similar situation as your own, which is ignorant.

    Do you think a trans person in Alabama could build community solidarity by an act of willpower alone? Or a gay man in Nebraska, or a lesbian woman in Utah, or a Latino person in Mississippi?

    I'm assuming from your words that your neighbors are mostly anti-maga. Do you really think that's the norm everywhere in this country? Because if it was, we wouldn't be in this mess to begin with.

    And by the way, are you assuming that the other commenter is a cishetero white man? Because if literally anyone else were to get out while they could, would you still be so opposed to it? I didn't see anything in their comment that indicates one way or another.

    their attitude and the criticism coming down from such a privileged position got to me.

    Let's look at the rest of their comment:

    I knew they wouldn't do shit after J6.

    Obviously talking about the government here, who failed to prosecute the leaders of that insurrection.

    Glad I got out of the US

    I would be too.

    so I don't have to deal with that theocratic shit hole Reich that's embedding itself into government

    They ain't wrong.

    What about this sounds condescending to you?

    You literally said there was no virtue, bravery, or solidarity in staying behind and doing so changed nothing, wish I could quote.

    Doing so literally changes nothing, ergo there is no virtue or bravery in it, only stupidity (if it's done by choice when there's an alternative option, at least).

    You might be able to argue that there can be solidarity in that, but it's the solidarity of crabs in the steamer. There's no shame in climbing overboard, but there is shame in dragging someone back down when they're trying to climb out. Not sure how you don't see that.

    The tendency for anyone with the resources to do so to put the Rational Self Interest we're conditioned for above the needs of the many really doesn't help. They're in a much better position to help than I am and chose not to.

    The cost of a plane ticket is not enough to fix this mess. Just because they got outta here doesn't mean they could have done anything to help even if they had stayed.

    Not exactly operating from a position of power.

    None of us are, dude. That's why some of us leave.

    I've turned down opportunities for myself because of the position it would leave my community in more than once, it's what makes me a part of it and what lets me feel like a good person.

    Would you do the same if 90% of your community were malicious, ignorant magas?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 16 hours ago (12 children)

    My brother in Christ, you're ignoring pretty much all of what I already made my best effort to communicate and this doesn't feel productive or fun. If you're going to rehash the original comment, maybe quote the whole thing instead of just the lines that, out of context, support the point you want to make. I'm here for a conversation, but you're treating it more like a contest and that just makes me want to forfeit. Calling community a privilege "is... a take...". I'm a fuckin bigshot in mine because I have this phone and a car to sleep in. It's the one thing available to literally everyone that can't be bought, sold or taken away and is maintained exclusively through participation. Fuck your fixation on identity too, you have no idea who I am or where I'm coming from or what life is like for the constructs you prop up so glibly to make your point. Community is absolutely available to every one of those people and exactly how they survive those environments. You can find it in a prison and I have. You can find it in a concentration camp and I will. I guarantee I have a much closer relationship with the human beings behind the shallow strawmen you present here than you do and that the kind of "support" you're offering would piss them off. Community is about shared purpose and meeting needs, not performative politics. Ignorance is entirely forgiveable, most things are. Just have to be genuine, well intentioned, and in this together. If you want to see what that's like, try leaving home without your wallet for a while.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 15 hours ago (11 children)

    you're ignoring pretty much all of what I already made my best effort to communicate and this doesn't feel productive or fun.

    I literally addressed every point you made; meanwhile you ignore everything I said and merely go on the attack, and you accuse me of arguing in bad faith?

    Literally everyone who has responded to you has told you that you clearly misread the original comment, and you refuse to concede that maybe you were mistaken from the start?

    I don't know why you were expecting this to be "fun" though, did you think we're here to entertain you?

    If you're going to rehash the original comment, maybe quote the whole thing instead of just the lines that, out of context, support the point you want to make.

    I quoted the entire comment. You read it wrong from the start and you won't just admit that.

    I'm here for a conversation, but you're treating it more like a contest

    Am I? I don't think I am, but you're the one framing it as "forfeit" so apparently you're viewing it that way...

    Calling community a privilege "is... a take..."

    It is a privilege. Not everyone has that. If you can't even grasp that other people's lived realities may be different from your own, then you have as little empathy as a republican.

    Fuck your fixation on identity too,

    I'm not fixated on identity, you're just making assumptions about the other commenter and I called you out on it.

    you have no idea who I am or where I'm coming from or what life is like for the constructs you prop up so glibly to make your point

    I never claimed to know anything about you other than what you've volunteered. I'm not the one making assumptions about you.

    Also, what do you mean by "constructs"? I asked you if you're against various kinds of vulnerable minorities leaving the country if they can, or if it's only because you're assuming details about the other commenter that you're so against them leaving.

    While you're dodging the question, and referring to those minorities as "constructs," you accuse me of "propping them up" and claim I don't know what life is like for them? You seem to be the one devoid of empathy here.

    Community is absolutely available to every one of those people and exactly how they survive those environments.

    You don't know what life is like for queer people living in right-wing areas, and it shows.

    guarantee I have a much closer relationship with the human beings behind the shallow strawmen you present here

    What fucking strawman am I presenting? You have a close relationship with the people in your community, sure, I never denied that. But where you err is in assuming every town in america is exactly the same as yours and trying to generalize your experience to encompass everyone else whom you don't even know. That is lacking empathy.

    than you do and that the kind of "support" you're offering would piss them off.

    First of all, you don't know a thing about me or the support I offer or to whom. Second of all, you're talking about "them" as if "they" are some a abstract category, that happen to also be a monolith whom you can personally speak for. That's only more evidence that you lack empathy, and you're the one using "them" as a prop.

    All I asked you is if you would feel the same way about someone leaving the country if you knew they were a vulnerable minority (which, by the way, you still haven't answered), and how you expect people who are vulnerable minorities to build solidarity when they're isolated in communities that don't support them (which again, you refuse to address and simply assert that it isn't a real problem and I somehow just made it up?).

    Community is about shared purpose and meeting needs, not performative politics.

    So being queer in a right-wing area where everyone wants you dead is "performative politics" to you?

    In this entire thread, you're the only one being performative. All I've said is to have some freaking empathy for others, and you refuse to understand or even acknowledge that some people's circumstances could differ from your own.

    And also, I might add, you tend to assume that whoever you're arguing with is some caricature of some privileged, out-of-touch, ignoramus, without ever inquiring about the details of who they actually are. Makes me strongly feel this might be projection on your part.

    If you want to see what that's like, try leaving home without your wallet for a while.

    I've been homeless, jackass. Don't preach to me about what it's like to struggle.

    Not sure why you're making this about me, though. I sure as hell wasn't making this about me. I simply came to bat for the commenter you initially replied to, because I saw that you were treating them unfairly. Everyone else here sees it too. Other than that, I've got no horse in this race.

    You know though, at first I thought you were serious and could actually be reasoned with, or might be worth the time. But now I see you're just a troll. So I'm done wasting my time on you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 13 hours ago* (10 children)

    Can you just leave me alone? Or at least like, quit wielding minority identities as a weapon? I did try to talk around that even though it's kinda fucked up, but now you're going full tribunal talking about I'm "dodging the question". I don't want to engage on that level at all but can't help stating I very much know what life is like for "queer people in right wing areas" and there is no fuckin way you've ever spent a single week actually on the street homeless. Said night first but you never know, the fuck ever that has to do with whether the third party you're so confident speaking for was calling the American government or the American left the real bootlickers in a post about election interference. Talking about "no horse in this race" out here chasing me around on a goddamn horse, coming at me about "vulnerable minorities" and trying to other me at the same damn time, literally confrontational over even the idea that posting can be fun of all things. You fuckin suck and I'm fuckin cold. Genuinely the worst interaction I have had on here to date

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 13 hours ago (9 children)

    You're not fucking serious. From the start you went on the attack, I came to the defense of somebody I don't even know because you were being unreasonable. And then you start attacking me, deflecting all my attempts at reasoning with you, and then accusing me of being callous towards minorities because I had the gall to remind you that some people are in extremely vulnerable situations right now so maybe you shouldn't be going around shaming people for leaving the country when you don't know a thing about their background? And you say I'm wielding them as a weapon?

    If you actually knew a gotdamn thing about what it's like to be queer in a right-wing area then you wouldn't be claiming that willpower alone is enough to build solidarity while also claiming that having a supportive community is somehow not a privilege.

    Everything you've said has been deflection and blame, you've offered nothing of substance besides your heartfelt desire to be a martyr and pull everyone down with you. Stop romanticizing victimhood. It fucking sucks, and if you had any real empathy you would understand that. Let people do what they need to to survive, and if that means getting to safety before it's too late then let them do so without lumping shame on them for not being fools.

    If you're not having fun then stop replying, nothing is compelling you to do so. Your account is one fucking day old, so calling this "your worst interaction to date" doesn't mean shit. Try not being an asshole and then crying foul when somebody calls you out on your shit.

    The original commenter was not calling "the american left" bootlickers, as was obvious from their comment, as everyone else here easily recognized. And the fact that you're still digging in about that tells me you're being disingenuous, you came here to start shit, and this whole fucking conversation has been a waste of time because you're a troll and I just need to stop feeding you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 12 hours ago (8 children)

    I did not read this one and consider this harassment. Again, please leave me alone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 12 hours ago (7 children)

    Your DARVO is so easy to see through.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 12 hours ago (6 children)

    I don't know what that is and don't want to. Please leave me alone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 hours ago (5 children)

    It's what you're doing. You can literally stop responding any time you want to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 hours ago (4 children)

    Please leave me alone. Whatever you think about anything else, at this point you're absolutely just harassing me. There's no dialogue whatsoever, just you saying awful stuff about me. Over and over. At this point across multiple threads here for multiple days. It might be petty, banal, and insignificant but it's also spiteful, cruel, and genuinely hurtful. What's even your goal? Would running me off of this site be enough, or do you need a fuckin suicide to cum?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 hours ago (3 children)

    Please leave me alone.

    Like I said, you can stop responding any time you want. You just seem to need to get the last word in so you can try to make me look like a villain?

    at this point you're absolutely just harassing me.

    Not even at all, dude. I tried reasoning with you and you went on the attack instead of engaging in good faith. That's on you.

    There's no dialogue whatsoever, just you saying awful stuff about me.

    Awful stuff like "you misunderstood the original comment and attacked them for no reason" and "when multiple people explained your mistake you completely ignored it and started acting victimized"?

    You ignored all the "dialogue" that was offered to you, descended into petty attacks, and now you complain that there's no dialogue?

    At this point across multiple threads here for multiple days.

    Liar. Your account is one day old. How could I possibly have engaged with you across multiple days? And what "multiple threads"? This is the only one I have any recollection of engaging you on. And since your account is one day old, you would think I'd remember if there's another.

    You can let this thread die any time you want. Just stop responding. But if it somehow gives you some sense of satisfaction to tell me I'm hurting your feelings, well, I'm not here to kink shame, but you should at least ask me for consent first.

    What's even your goal?

    I already told you, and it was clear from the start: to stick up for the original commenter you replied to and treated unfairly. What is your goal?

    Would running me off of this site be enough, or do you need a fuckin suicide to cum?

    I'm not responsible for the choices you make. Threatening suicide to try ladening me with guilt is a manipulation tactic. Especially while insinuating that it was somehow my intention to make you do it.

    Go get help if you need it. Telling you that you were wrong about being an asshole to somebody for misunderstanding their comment isn't pushing you to suicide. If that's enough to push you over the edge, you were already going to jump anyway. Go to the hospital.

    Come back to the fediverse when you're more stable, and as long as you engage in good faith then I guarantee you I won't be calling you out as a troll.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

    Please leave me alone. This simple request is the only self-defense I can offer to your endless onslaught of bile. It's so obviously not ok to treat anyone like this. Please leave me alone. This is day 2, and you spread your hate into a conversation I was having with someone else yesterday. If you're genuinely curious about the history of this account you can read it, it's short simple and public. All you seem interested in is bullying and "beating" me. You have superior tech, superior resources, and for whatever reason berating me over and over is what you're choosing to do with them. Please leave me alone. You talk about consent and I very explicitly do not want what you are continuing to force on me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 hours ago (1 child)

    Please leave me alone. This simple request is the only self-defense I can offer

    As I've told you multiple times, you can stop responding at literally any moment and then this conversation will be over.

    This is day 2, and you spread your hate into a conversation I was having with someone else yesterday.

    What hate? I told you to stop being a jerk to someone after misconstruing their comment and making assumptions about them. How is that hate?

    If you're genuinely curious about the history of this account you can read it, it's short simple and public.

    Just skimmed through, as you invited me to do, and as I suspected, this is the only thread I've ever interacted with you on. So yes, you were lying about this "multiple threads" thing.

    You have superior tech, superior resources,

    Not sure what you even mean by that, seeing as I'm typing this out on a budget-tier phone. But you've been making assumptions about your counterparts this entire conversation, so I shouldn't be surprised.

    Please leave me alone. You talk about consent and I very explicitly do not want what you are continuing to force on me.

    How about this: you leave me alone. You think this is a one-way conversation? You think you're not participating in this and keeping it going every bit as much as I am?

    That's your hypocrisy and exceptionalism, your pedestal-standing, your victim complex, the very thing I pointed out from the start. Nobody here is harassing you. As you stated, this is a public forum. If you don't want to be a part of the conversation, simply don't participate. No one is forcing you.

    You can even block me, I don't even care. Just stop pretending I'm somehow "doing this to you" when you keep putting your own hand on the hot stove over and over and over.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 hours ago

    Please leave me alone. I have as much right to exist and communicate as anyone and should not be repeatedly put in a position of having to assert otherwise. Which is all I am doing at this point. I am still here, I will not be silenced or ostracized, and all I want from you is to be left alone. If you don't have better tech, you are just plain better able to communicate than I am. I can't break out quotes or copy text like you do, so I can't pull in the example where you jump into another conversation calling me a troll etc. And I don't want to. All I want is for you to leave me alone. Please.

  • source
  • parent