you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 2 days ago (1 child)

I'm not a lawyer, so if you want to point me to a source that would be interesting, but going off just the Wikipedia page it seems to specifically include the insurrection within the scope of this decision

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago

    The evidence that the White House counsel was excluded from the meetings while his personal and campaign lawyers were is why Smith was able to re-file. It was evidence that Trump was specifically acting as a candidate and not as the President, so it wasn't covered by the official acts immunity.

  • source
  • parent