▲ 717 ▼ Four is 6 7 for infosec (thelemmy.club) submitted 2 days ago by CombatWombat@feddit.online to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev 22 comments fedilink hide all child comments via
[–] nylo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 days ago (4 children) what is this referring to? not in infosec at all lol permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] nehal3m@lemmy.zip 44 points 2 days ago (3 children) The headline is: One of the private keys protecting part of the global HTTPS trust system was, according to a report from The Register published October 20, 2026, the number 4. Not a 384-bit cryptographic value. Just the digit 4. More info here: https://tech-insider.org/emudhra-ca-private-keys-compromised-number-4-2026/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 day ago (2 children) To be precise, it was 00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:04 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 day ago Wow someone actually took that xkcd comic seriously. permalink fedilink source parent [–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago To be fair, that is a potential random value permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nehal3m@lemmy.zip 44 points 2 days ago (3 children) The headline is: One of the private keys protecting part of the global HTTPS trust system was, according to a report from The Register published October 20, 2026, the number 4. Not a 384-bit cryptographic value. Just the digit 4. More info here: https://tech-insider.org/emudhra-ca-private-keys-compromised-number-4-2026/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 day ago (2 children) To be precise, it was 00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:04 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 day ago Wow someone actually took that xkcd comic seriously. permalink fedilink source parent [–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago To be fair, that is a potential random value permalink fedilink source parent
[–] diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 day ago (2 children) To be precise, it was 00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:04 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 day ago Wow someone actually took that xkcd comic seriously. permalink fedilink source parent [–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago To be fair, that is a potential random value permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 day ago Wow someone actually took that xkcd comic seriously. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago To be fair, that is a potential random value permalink fedilink source parent