you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -15 points 1 day ago (4 children)
  • [–] 12 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Its much more complicated than that.

    Cancer is a group of diseases, some of them have vaccines now. But CIA had to use vaccination drives to look for bin laden, while knowing it will fuel anti-vaxxer movement. We can't let those terroist win.

    We also know there isn't a single human alive that doesn't have microplastics in their blood. That's probably not good, (there are some research to suggest that it contributes to cancer). But plastics are a by product of petroleum, and lots of people will lose a lot of money if we stopped it.

    Then also alcohol has a very strong connection with cancer. But lots of christians wouldn't like blood of jesus being demonized like that.

    Then there is also research that suggest caloric deficit activates genes that fight cancer. But we must think of the shareholders, the marketing industry, and the global consumerist economy.

    So you are kinda right, but also its waaaaaaaay more complicated/nuanced/messy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 23 hours ago*

    they're right in the most boring and depressing way possible, in that we could totally just give everyone the HPV vaccine but nooooooooo that would be expensive...

    Cancer caused by HPV used to be, like, the main cause of death for women in the USA, IIRC. Now people barely realize it's a thing that can happen.
    We cured (a) cancer and fucking forgot about it.

  • source
  • parent