734
Narrows it down a bit, I guess 🤷🏻 (thelemmy.club)
submitted 1 day ago by to c/curatedtumblr@sh.itjust.works
138 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
tilthat T1,1_ there is no physical description of Jesus in the Bible. volcel-official False Luke 2:52 He's larger than a baby amateuropinions By the description of him driving the moneylenders from the temple, we can also tell that he fit inside the temple, which gives us an upper bound as well as a lower bound on his size. F7:1 veraxplus Ysf. It's been said that Jesus Christ was larger than a baby but smaller than a temple
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 19 points 1 day ago (1 child)

That he was not attractive the bible makes quite clear.

  • when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should desire him. (KJV)

  • He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him. (NIV)

https://www.biblegateway.com/verse/en/Isaiah%2053%3A2

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •