you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 18 points 2 days ago (24 children)
  • [–] 51 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (21 children)

    Rabbi is a jewish religious leader and the usual continuation to that sequence (priest, minister, rabbi walk into a bar, etc.)

    Rabbit, then, is like an autocorrect or typo.

    Blood types are most commonly a, ab, b, and by far the most common blood type is type-o, so its a subversion of a normal joke coupled with some cute wordplay.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    Blooe type distribution is higly different between regions/ethnic groups. Type-0 is the most common one in USA, but not everywhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 days ago* (1 child)

    True, however even global numbers put O ahead of the other major ones, from what I’ve been able to find.

    The numbers differ but all sources that discuss global numbers that I could find agreed that O is the most prevelant, at between 32-43% https://biologyinsights.com/what-is-the-most-common-blood-type-and-why-it-matters/

    I am very much open to correction on this if you have a citation, though! Its not that easy to actually find that statistic, as most things are broken down by country :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 days ago* (15 children)

    Okay but I still don't get it. What do blood types have to with rabbis/rabbits? Where's the wordplay?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 2 days ago (14 children)

    Rabbit is a typo (misspelling) of Rabbi. Type O is a blood type.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 2 days ago (11 children)

    Okay but what's the connection? Where's the joke? Is the joke that it's an anti-joke? Some Norm Macdonald shit?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 days ago (9 children)
  • [+] -6 points 2 days ago (8 children)

    Really? That's it? Thanks for explaining.

    No wonder I was struggling. I thought it was going to be deeper than that...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago (7 children)

    This post. This post:

    "Really? That's it? Thanks for explaining.

    No wonder I was struggling. I thought it was going to be deeper than that..."

    These words should never be repeated.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 days ago (6 children)
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago (5 children)

    Why so? Don't you think such words are limiting in nature? Defeatist, dare I say. Repeat it, not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 days ago* (4 children)

    I do not understand the reference you're making. Are you experiencing an episode of psychosis?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

    Psythik, refer above, but infer not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 days ago* (2 children)

    I don't understand what you're trying to say because you speak like you're quoting Shakespeare, and I have ADHD. Knock it off and speak normally. You sound like a god damn fool when you use this kind of prose.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments