▲ 76 ▼ Why do you use a systemd-less distro (if you do)? (programming.dev) submitted 1 week ago by SwooshBakery624@programming.dev to c/linux@programming.dev 74 comments fedilink hide all child comments I'm curious to know why people use systemd-less distributions. Which one would you recommend to someone who wants to stop using systemd?
[–] Arcka@midwest.social 15 points 1 week ago (2 children) I do not trust Red Hat not to be sold to someone who will take advantage They've been IBM since 2019. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] hunger@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago Hardly any of the core systemd people work at Redhat these days. Microsoft employs more of them then Redhat. Right now I think Lennarts new company employes several of the key systemd people. Contributions are comming in from all major distributions though. permalink fedilink source parent [–] nyan@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago And IBM could very easily sell them on, or the leadership there could change and decide to do something unpleasant (although I know IBM has a long history of being about as maneuverable as a parade float, it still could happen). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hunger@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago Hardly any of the core systemd people work at Redhat these days. Microsoft employs more of them then Redhat. Right now I think Lennarts new company employes several of the key systemd people. Contributions are comming in from all major distributions though. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nyan@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago And IBM could very easily sell them on, or the leadership there could change and decide to do something unpleasant (although I know IBM has a long history of being about as maneuverable as a parade float, it still could happen). permalink fedilink source parent