Praxis
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 25 points 20 hours ago (7 children)

That's why we need people to vote in the primaries.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

    The primaries that they can decide not to have? Or that the winner didn't really win?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

    at least one state had open primaries, I'd need to check if others do but we got ours from a ballot measure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

    Wow, how generous of them to give one state a primary, maybe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 19 hours ago (1 child)

    Wilding v. DNC is the court case where the DNC admitted that they don't have to abide by the primaries because they are a private entity and can nominate whomever they want.

    They admitted this in open court because so many people voted in the primaries for Bernie, and yet they nominated Hillary, that they could no longer hide this fact from the majority of the Democrat voting public.

    The truth was short lived though, as that case is almost completely memory holed, and everyone pretends like none of that happened a decade ago.

    I was there. I remember. Sure, vote in the primaries and vote for the "lesser evil", but we won't win anything without infiltrating the Democrat bureaucracy and forming unions and serious protests.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment