44
Why don't movie ratings just have letters indicating objectionable material? (feddit.org)
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
63 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

LVNSD would be much more informative than "Rated R," or, "PG-13."

  • L - Language
  • V - Violence
  • N - Nudity
  • S - Sex
  • D - Drug use
  • B - Blasphemy

Let's include recommended age at the end, so theaters can know whom to exclude (legal reasons):

Family Guy LVNDB-18

Dexter's Lab V-8

Looney Toons VD-8

Telly Tubbies 0

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 5 days ago (1 child)

What do atheists have to do with this? You can find at least two people who disagree on where the line is in the same church/temple/etc, much less the same religion. Hell, I know people who sit on the same pew and disagree on K-POP Demon Hunters. Taking the position that it’s all made up as they go sounds like they are the ones who know better. Just ask everyone who believes in a god to come to an agreement. Or take the easy route and slap a B on everything.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago

    I find most things are generally just not offensive at all when it comes to religion just because they don’t include anything relating to it anyway.

    Sure you can just slap a B on everything and it’ll sorta agree with what I originally said, in a way, except needlessly alienate some people? Is media not made for profit and trying to please as many consumers as possible?

    Although, I guess it’ll trigger some of these people replying to my comments who like to go off at the mention of any religion lol

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent