44
Why don't movie ratings just have letters indicating objectionable material? (feddit.org)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
63 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

LVNSD would be much more informative than "Rated R," or, "PG-13."

  • L - Language
  • V - Violence
  • N - Nudity
  • S - Sex
  • D - Drug use
  • B - Blasphemy

Let's include recommended age at the end, so theaters can know whom to exclude (legal reasons):

Family Guy LVNDB-18

Dexter's Lab V-8

Looney Toons VD-8

Telly Tubbies 0

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Yes I can make the case. My case: doesthedogdie exists. I know a lot of people who get more upset about seeing an animal hurt than human on human violence.

Who gets to arbitrarily decide which is important? So what if it balloons? Again, the more info the better imo.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [โ€“] [S] 0 points 6 days ago*

    Doesthedogdie literally has about 100 different categories (more than even the letters of the alphabet). Analysis Paralysis is a thing. That's why we don't want to balloon it. It's also why movies don't target specific ages on their ratings already, but a range of ages. Too many options means less familiarity with the system and information overload.

    I know a lot of people who are more upset by knives than guns. You can't describe every little detail in a film, because someone could get upset about it. The ratings are a guide for parents on what's appropriate for their kids.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent