โฒ 44 โผ Why don't movie ratings just have letters indicating objectionable material? (feddit.org) submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by ki4jgt@feddit.org to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml 63 comments fedilink hide all child comments LVNSD would be much more informative than "Rated R," or, "PG-13." L - Language V - Violence N - Nudity S - Sex D - Drug use B - Blasphemy Let's include recommended age at the end, so theaters can know whom to exclude (legal reasons): Family Guy LVNDB-18 Dexter's Lab V-8 Looney Toons VD-8 Telly Tubbies 0
[โ] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 days ago (1 child) TV content ratings do this permalink fedilink source hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] ki4jgt@feddit.org [S] 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) That's where I got it. It's a lot more direct. But the categories make absolutely no sense. D, for example, is sexually suggestive speech. L is language. Why are they separate? Kids who can hear shit, hell, fuck, and damn, should be able to hear about Daddy opening Mom's bra. Or, sexual symbolism. You've got about 3 letters, in one rating that indicate varying degrees of sex, and no other objectionable content. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] ki4jgt@feddit.org [S] 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) That's where I got it. It's a lot more direct. But the categories make absolutely no sense. D, for example, is sexually suggestive speech. L is language. Why are they separate? Kids who can hear shit, hell, fuck, and damn, should be able to hear about Daddy opening Mom's bra. Or, sexual symbolism. You've got about 3 letters, in one rating that indicate varying degrees of sex, and no other objectionable content. permalink fedilink source parent
