Airplanes deploy revers thrusters when landing which are basically just shaped metal shields that move into place behind the engines to provide reverse thrust and slow the plane.

But adding a fan on a sailboat is seen as stupid and doesn't work.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 18 points 1 week ago (26 children)

The reverse thruster is force originating from the plane pushing against the air.

The fan on the sailboat is force originating from the boat pushing against the boat.

  • source
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] [S] -2 points 1 week ago (24 children)

    In my mind there is no difference in these setups

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Imagine standing on the boat and pushing on the sail.

    Which is the same as the fan pushing on the sail.

    The force is all contained in the boat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 child)

    But the air is not contained on the boat, it is pushed away from the boat after hitting the sail. Since that air has mass it will produce and equal force pushing on the sail, aka thrust.

    A jet engine with deployed reverses is just a fan mounted on the plane pushing against the plane but it works just fine.

    A sail is just a very inefficient deflector of air, but the principle is the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago

    For what it's worth, a thrust reverser is also a very inefficient deflector of air. It's better than nothing, and jet engines produce a lot of thrust, so even inefficiently reversed it still provides a significant amount of reverse thrust which happens to be quite useful for slowing down an aircraft when there's minimal weight-on-wheels or on slippery runways, but it's still only a tiny fraction of what the engines produce in normal operation for forward flight.

    A fan blasting air at a sail is also quite inefficient, but as other comments note, it does technically work. It just works so poorly for the amount of energy you're putting into the fan that you'd probably be better off rowing or just using the sail properly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago* (10 children)

    And both work, the sail is just very inefficient as a trust reverser. Just remove the sail and use the fan directly. You can rotate the entire fan if you want to reverse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 week ago (8 children)

    "The idea works if you just remove this half and reverse the other half."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    I prefer Lemmy to Reddit but the userbase here is way more insufferable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    It's a venn diagram of people banned from reddit and people who think they're too good for reddit, what do you expect.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago* (2 children)

    Well yeah, because the sail is not needed at all, you just need the fan.

    A modern commercial jet engine is just a very powerful fan anyway. You move air backward, you move forwards. Works just as well on boat as on a plane.

    The sail would just be a very inefficient reverser.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Yeah, so inefficient as to be completely ineffective. In other words, "it doesn't work".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago*

    No, it's not completely ineffective, just very ineffective.

    If you blow enough air at a sufficient sturdy sail you can absolutely generate trust from the airflow the sail deflects.

    But you'll be more efficient if you remove the sail and just point the fan in the other direction.

    You'd be even more efficient if you put the fan under the boat and push the water instead of the air.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    It works by redirecting the flow of outgoing gas forwards.

    This may shock you to learn, but typing your question into a search engine and reading any Wikipedia articles in the results is something you can do yourself; it's much faster and more accurate than asking random strangers on the internet.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thrust_reversal

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    But it isn't as fun

    You know that everyone knows that Wikipedia and search engines exist, right? People don't post questions on forums because information doesn't exist elsewhere. It's because of the social factor.

    Besides, Wikipedia isn't perfect, and search engines have gone to shit

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 0 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    How is the sail in this pic any different?

    It is redirecting the flow of air from the fan

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    The reverse thrusters redirect the air coming out in the opposite direction, so it is like turning the fan in the opposite direction.

    A sail catches the air to pull the boat along and some of it bleeds off, but it does not direct any air backwards to propel the ship forward.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    I mean sure, maybe there is no difference. But then, like the plane you're better off not using the sail and just pointing the fan the opposite way so it pushes the boat fwd.

    The engine on a plane pushes the airplane forward. The reversers redirect a portion of the thrust forward slowing the aircraft down. The best thrust reversers get MAYBE 50% efficiency. On the boat there is no reason to throw out half the fans thrust.

    That's combined with the fact that the sail isn't an effective thrust reverser and that the worst case efficiency is negative. If you don't redirect enough air backwards you won't even overcome the fans thrust let alone produce a net reverse thrust.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    Can you push your car while sitting inside it? That's essentially what your boat picture depicts. Could you turn around the fan and push the other way? Sure, then you end up with an airboat. Or better yet you turn the fan around and stick it in the water.

    Although this could just be another of your physics trolling questions, where you just want to argue in the comments. Apologies if that's a different user and I've mixed you up.

  • source
  • parent