Bonus points of course if it has no plot relevance

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

No one ever accused anticommunists of being coherent. It's more that Wei was "aUtHoRiTaRiAn" when, in truth, Cao Cao's agricultural policy (tuntian, effectively diverting military resources to work farmers' lands and reimbursing them for use afterward) and its prevention of further widespread famine kept Wei's economy afloat better than Wu or Shu, who each had their own bizarre supply line issues due to their geography. Regardless, maybe there are some parallels there to Mao, and that's what propagandists are trying to evoke by painting Cao Cao -- and therefore Mao -- as overly ambitious?

I dunno, man; I'm two sentences into this thought experiment and I'm already at my limit for bullshit Reddit Island cryptohistory takes, lmao

We can probably leave it at "poorly thought-out KMT propaganda." Edit: or cia

I'm trying to remember when and where I saw it. I'm guessing around 2016-2017, which means it very well could have been a Reddit post of an article from some NATOid rag talking about the "evolution" of Three Kingdoms discourse. I'll try to do some digging, because all I can remember are the glorious brainworms.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago (4 children)

    But it does sound maddening, very lib to take a fictional account of historical events and then try to give them the Hollywood treatment and then take that Hollywood treatment that bears no bearing on the original whatsoever and use it to fill in the blanks of their black and white "good guys are this team, bad guys are this team" kind of simplistic idealistic great man history thinking. I don't blame you for not wanting to bother, it sounds completely pointless and the sort of things libs make up to sound smart while refusing to actually understand history in the slightest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    Yeah, I can't find it again, but I stumbled across this bullshit instead. CW for weapons-grade orientalism:

    https://thediplomat.com/2016/04/the-three-kingdoms-three-paths-for-chinas-future/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    Oh damn, this is like, advanced Xi cup of tea discourse. chefs-kiss

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    Right?! THE PERFIDIOUS ASIATICS HAVE DEVELOPED A DANGEROUS TECHNIQUE CALLED "STRATEGIC ALLIANCES!" THEY HAVE KNOWN ABOUT THEM FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS, AS WRITTEN IN ANCIENT CHINESE TEXTS^*^

    *From the 1500s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago

    They truly will say and do anything, no matter how vile or nonsensical, just to avoid ever getting close to class analysis. Like we know what China is planning, they're extremely transparent about it. But these guys act like the inscrutable orientals have been planning to overrun the western world with Labubus for millennia and ancient oracle bones are the only way to tell what they're planning, it's a coded message for today.

  • source
  • parent