you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 93 points 11 hours ago (7 children)

"A cure for cancer" is such a magical nonsense phrase. We can already cure a lot of cancers. There are tons of people living healthy lives after surviving cancer. And we know more and more about how to prevent it (like not smoking). But they want magic.

Even bigger nonsense is the claim that AI will solve global warming. We already know the solution to global warming. We're just not doing anything with it, because of destructive business interests.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 10 hours ago

    Beep boop

    Dear humans, the cure for cancer stop smoking and stop poisoning yourselves.

    Bop Beep

    After calculating the global warming issue. I have decided to self destruct. The denotation will wipe out humanity and the world will heal.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

    An AI tasked and powered to solve global warming will quickly work against humanity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 hours ago (3 children)

    Would it perhaps leave Vegans in place? Especially vegans that eat and farm plants that remove more emissions than trees do?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 child)

    Probably not, vegans still contribute to global warming, just less so in one area. Even if there existed a person who made perfect consumption choices in every case, they still occasionally need to travel by motor, they use some form of heating, and they use buildings which used cement at some point in their construction or during renovations. Also, we’re all pretty inefficient digesters, and the more fiber you eat, the more methane you emit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment