you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

we know multiple solutions to global warming, but none that keep both the environment and industry alive

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

    @jumping_redditor

    Not true. It's possible for industry to coexist with a healthier environment, but that would mean taking responsibility for their externalities, and that's apparently already too much to ask.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 hours ago (1 child)

    People forget that our economic system isn't a law of nature. It's a social construct, and can be changed just like any other.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 hours ago

    @Dojan

    Parts of it are even pretty recent. The Friedman Doctrine, for example. "a company’s social responsibility is to increase its profits and maximize shareholder value". I call it the worst idea in capitalism. It's what's forcing companies to pollute and lie about it, to bribe politicians and to create misinformation campaigns. As long as it's legal, it is their responsibility to do all of that.

    The idea stems from 1970 and became popular during the 1980s. It is the most harmful idea in capitalism (which is not short of harmful ideas).

  • source
  • parent