You're making an [incorrect] assumption and then challenging people to prove it to you.

Idk if this is rage bait, AI trolling, or you're trying to get people to do your debate class homework for you, but you're not gonna get anyone with any braincells to say science has weaknesses.

You might as well be asking someone to prove to you the drawbacks of breathing. Sure, someone could twist their brain to come up with something, but any answer will be contrived to fit your inane question.

There's no weakness to science that isn't also a strength. Science makes no guarantees. We are always learning more about the world and what we learn can contradict the best science could do a few years ago.

When I was a kid I was taught we would inevitably experience another ice age someday. Now science says we're headed toward runaway greenhouse effect without intervention.

But also, when I was a kid, AIDS was a death sentence. Now we have medications that make it barely an inconvenience — as long as you can get the meds. We learned more.