267
What's something that you were surprised to find out a lot of people hate? (lemm.ee)
submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) by to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
572 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 32 points 3 years ago (7 children)

Snap on Ubuntu. I totally did not comprehend that it was proprietary; I just thought it was convenient, like apt.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 27 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Wait it's also proprietary in addition to being slower, more annoying and much more intrusive than Flatpaks let alone just native packages? That not only makes it heavily obsolete but is even more against the whole point of Linux than Windows' winget (if the open source community repo is used instead of msstore), as snap is hardcoded to use the closed Servers from Canonical. That's just bad on another level honestly.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)

    Snap as a format is not proprietary but Canonical's Snap Store is. And Canonical's Snap Store is basically the only one in existence and (semi?) hard-coded into all the tools.

    In any case, on a fresh install I usually throw out all the Snap stuff and go for Flatpak, because for some apps, these two formats tend to be the only options anymore.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    Removing snap from Ubuntu, at least, seems to be more impossible with every update as far as I've heard. Apparently it just reinstalls itself if you try to use apt in order to install eg. Firefox and then uses snap for that package. So I'd guess actually disabling snap would mean somehow configuring or editing apt itself or some addon to it. Any way, such a closed design in combination with the tactics Canonical (at least did) use in order to keep snap as a default looks kinda Microsofty to me.
    Wann Klage gegen Canonical wegen Monopolstellung?
    In Englisch nem Deutschen zu antworten fühlt sich affig an lül

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    Removing snap from Ubuntu, at least, seems to be more impossible with every update as far as I’ve heard. Apparently it just reinstalls itself if you try to use apt in order to install eg. Firefox and then uses snap for that package. So I’d guess actually disabling snap would mean somehow configuring or editing apt itself or some addon to it.

    Basically you need to have a list of packages to avoid in your head. :) And with every passing release there are more. Great!!

    Since I've gone back to using Ubuntu I've managed to avoid these traps somehow.

    Wann Klage gegen Canonical wegen Monopolstellung?

    While their practices suck, they don't exactly have a monopoly. If they're eventually bought out by MS, something could happen. (So far, MS seems happy (and capable) to do its own thing though.)

    In Englisch nem Deutschen zu antworten fühlt sich affig an lül

    Yeah, but this is a public thread in an English-language community.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    I didn't know that, but I already disliked it because installed apps don't really integrate in the system (eg: file system access, themes).

    Even Ubuntu installs this way something as basic as Firefox, what the fuck? At least I managed to get rid of the snap version and install it properly.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    Ahh, I hate Snap so much. It actually what drove me to switch to Arch (btw). It was just so annoying going to install something and having it try to pull in snap and all its dependencies... And of course, if you don't want Snap you have to deal with the inconvenience of finding another way to install the app.

    There are reasons to dislike Snap on principle and also very practical reasons. It liked randomly preventing the system from shutting down. Installing a new OS on a slow or unreliable internet connection and want a browser? How about we install Snap and then tell to download that thing and maybe a bunch of random internal dependencies with no visible progress and unreliable error handling? Get it away from me.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent