you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

He was probably preoccupied with digestion because he suffered from really bad gastrointestinal and abdominal issues his whole life - among many other severe ailments. Why do you think he was reactionary?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 12 hours ago

    He was undoubtedly a reactionary. Losurdo's book on Nietzsche describes how he's a reactionary. This review of the book touches on some of the major points (the book itself is long af at about a 1000 pages, I only made it half way through before tiring out and giving up). If I were to explain his worldview in a nutshell, it's that culture requires that there be a permanent underclass for the cultured aristocracy to oppress; there is no culture without this. Because of this, socialism, along with any strain of thought that leads the aristocracy to take pity on those beneath them, must be combatted

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 15 hours ago

    Why do you think he was reactionary?

    Probably because he was. The easiest thing to point to is that he was a devout anticommunist on the basis not only of disdain for the specific communist movements of his day but because he thought the stated goals of communism, e.g. "to each according to their need," an end to war, etc. would effectively mean the death of the human spirit. He gets sanitized all the time but he was fundamentally loudly opposed to social progress except for his own schema of an atomized second "revaluation of all values" to have the non-sheeple live as moral artists and inventors.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 16 hours ago* (2 children)

    gastrointestinal issues = reactionary ???

    Fuck I gotta tell my tummy to chill before I start seig heiling

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments