I 100% did not. That's why my comment was in the form of a question. Because I couldn't, and still can't, imagine what a primary 10 years ago has to say about our current landscape that wouldn't be better understood through recent campaigns like Mamdani's, el-Sayed's, and pre-scandal Platner's. Or if we need to examine losses, any of the times when the progressive got boxed out. Bernie had an entire second run between now and then.

The reason they frame it with Bernie is not because Bernie's run is more demonstrative of important current dynamics, it's because it's the progressive lost Lost Cause that will get clicks. Or in my case, not get clicks because literally everything that needs to be said about that election has already been said. Because it was 10 fucking years ago and people have been talking about it repeatedly for a literal decade.

All of that stuff in the book was more or less out in the open and publicity known during the primary campaign. Leftists and progressives could have registered to vote in the primary, and if they had none of the fuckery would have amounted to anything. But they didn't and Hillary got nearly double the votes Bernie did. Also Bernie isn't a democrat, everybody ignores this, of course the democratic party would favor an actual democrat for their nomination, but I digress. If leftists and progressives actually voted he'd have won, but they didn't, and it wasn't remotely close.

Oh my God, how did you not already find one of the hundreds of other articles that gave that same validation in the last 10 years? If you were waiting for this moment for that, that's pretty much on you.